Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  40 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 40 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

40

BizVoice/Indiana Chamber – March/April 2015

‘Ah-hah I want to do this for the rest of my

life,’ ” he explains.

The problem is particularly pervasive at

community colleges. “Their largest degree

program is general studies, which means

those students never really made a (major)

decision,” Jones notes.

Merisotis feels part of the problem is

“that colleges and universities are really being

squeezed by the demands of the students for

choice. But as Complete College America has

pointed out, this idea of excess choice has a

real, real consequence in terms of the success

of students. They are literally facing a

cacophony of choices that’s confusing and

often overwhelming.”

The institutions need to help sort things

out, Gora concedes.

“I bet 90% of colleges now have degree

programs in which every semester there is

clearly defined what courses you take and

how they lead to a four-year degree. The

problem is that too many students really

aren’t sure what they want to do.”

When Gora presided over Ball State,

there was realization that too many of the

students who dropped out hadn’t declared a

major. That triggered structured career

counseling for students that begins with

freshman orientation.

“It requires them to go to a meeting with

a counselor to talk about what their test

results showed in terms of where their skill

sets were, where their interests were and

whether there was an obvious career path or

not,” she outlines.

This process became required, Gora

says, because too many students didn’t sign

up for it when it was optional.

The end result saw Ball State increase its

graduation rate by getting students to focus at

a much earlier juncture on their potential

career path.

“We knew all the time (the majors)

could change. What matters is that students

have a clear understanding of what their

future might be and how what they are

doing now is going to lead to that desired

future plan.”

On their own, “far too many students

don’t have enough experience and enough

information to make that decision early

enough to have real impact on completing

(college) in a timely fashion,” she concludes.

Policies like this one at Ball State

represent a growing trend, according to

Jones. “More colleges and universities are

requiring students to plan and to actually pick

a major.”

Gora admits, “Overall, it’s been a bit of

a hurdle for colleges to say, ‘OK, we have to

act more parental, if you will, and we have to

reduce choice. We have to require things.’

“Colleges never used to take attendance

– never. That was considered preschool-ish,

but now some classes will do that. It’s been a

real culture change for colleges.”

Student ownership

However, Jones isn’t implying students

should be let off the hook; they have a

responsibility for their education path –

particularly those receiving financial aid.

“Students on scholarships or grants or

with subsidized loans, we should treat more as

a partnership. We should expect reasonable

progress toward degrees, a reasonable

attempt to get a job and those kinds of things.

“So it’s not giving the student money

without any expectation of what’s expected

from the student. That part I really like, and I

think that we see more state financial aid

programs start to put in those kinds of

features,” he remarks.

Indeed, students taking part in Indiana’s

largest two aid programs – the Frank

O’Bannon grant and the 21st Century

Scholars program – are obligated to do just as

Jones outlined. Students must complete at

least 30 credits each calendar year.

The Indiana Commission for Higher

Education said in a January release that the

response to these 2013 financial aid reforms

has been encouraging, with double-digit

improvements in the percentages of students

taking and completing the minimum number

of required courses to graduate on time.

The funding factor

Jones stresses that the general public

believes it’s important for their children to go

to college, but that doesn’t necessarily

translate to action by the state regarding its

public universities.

“If you go to the Legislature and ask

them if they had a discretionary dollar where

would they spend it, higher education ranks

down there with prisons and welfare. And

it’s because, even though the general public

views higher education very highly, they (the

legislators) view it as private value, a private

good – not a public good.

“But it’s as important that we educate

your child or Jamie’s children as it is we

educate our own children because that

benefits all of society,” he underscores.

According to the latest Government

Accountability Office report, state government

funding to pay for public colleges has been on

a steady decline for the last decade. In 2003,

states provided 32% of funding; by 2012 the

public state support was down to 23%.

“The disinvestment in higher education

is troubling, and it’s troubling because of

what we know in terms of the enormous

public benefits that you get from higher

education,” Merisotis declares.

“Part of the challenge, though, is that

higher education has not been clear about the

outcomes it’s producing. How they can

demonstrate that these students have relevant

knowledge, capacity, skills and experiences.

… They’ve been slow to respond to the idea

that a college degree should mean something

that you can document, that you can be clear

about – not just at this individual institution

but in a broader sense.

“The funding decline should be a wakeup

call for the sector that it’s got to focus on

producing those outcomes,” he surmises.

Merisotis is a proponent of outcomes-

based funding – but done the right way.

“You shouldn’t be comparing institutions

with dissimilar missions. You should be focusing

on making sure that you take into account the

student population that’s served and what the

mission of the institution is. But you should

expect institutions to produce results in terms

of student outcomes, in terms of success rates

of the students. If it’s a research institution,

“The idea that the focus of authority

for the decision-making should rest

solely in the hands of the colleges

and the universities without any

expectations in terms of those kinds of

outcomes – those days are behind us.”

– Jamie Merisotis

Continued on page 46