Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  59 / 74 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 59 / 74 Next Page
Page Background

July/August 2017 – BizVoice/Indiana Chamber

59

RESOURCES:

Carey Hamilton, Indiana Recycling Coalition, at

www.indianarecycling.org

| Paul England, Pratt Industries, at

www.prattindustries.com

|

Peter Zurkow, Perpetual Recycling Solutions, at

www.perpetualrpet.com

| Stephen Hogan at GEP Fuel & Energy Indiana | Jay Chu and Lawrence

Bowlin, East-Terra Plastics, at

www.east-terra.com

| Rumpke Waste & Recycling at

www.rumpke.com

Bowlin chimes in with a chuckle: “I really

want to stress that it’s a free service. Believe

me, I’ve had to tell the farmers multiple times,

‘It’s free! We’re not going to charge you.’ ”

The day

BizVoice

®

spoke with Bowlin and

Chu, interviews were underway to start

hiring and training the crew to perform the

collections in all 92 counties in Indiana.

“All of that plastic we collect, we’ll track

what county it came from. We’ll track

poundage. And it will be brought back to our

facility where we will re-wash and re-clean

it,” Bowlin declares. “We already have an

industrial end use for it. We already have

another line of business for that ground-up

and granulated plastic for another user.”

With the agricultural plastics recycling

program, “it’s about educating not just the

farming community, but people in solid waste

management districts that we’re here, letting

them know our presence to try to maximize

participation. I think 2017 is going to be a

huge year for Indiana recycling!”

Over the last four years, Indiana has taken careful

steps to guarantee that any change in policy on water

supplies and infrastructure is backed by valid data and

information. In 2012, the General Assembly passed

legislation that directed the state to collect data on how

utilities planned for changes in water supply.

In 2015, there was a survey of water utilities in the

largest 15 communities, along with five smaller

systems, that found near unanimous interest in planning

for the future and knowing more about the growing

withdrawals of neighboring water users.

After the catastrophe in Flint, Michigan, the state

conducted another survey that included almost every

community water system in Indiana. The purpose was

to understand how each one invested in replacement of

aging infrastructure and how well each system understood

water losses due to leaking, aging infrastructure.

Survey says

The results were staggering.

The 2016 survey found that the need for infrastructure

vastly outpaces investments. Collectively, we need more

than $2.3 billion to begin replacing the aging pipes,

treatment plants and fire hydrants that treat and deliver

water in our communities. Further, after that initial

replacement, using basic assumptions about how fast

pipelines and plants depreciate, the utilities across the state

need more than $800 million per year in new funding.

This same survey showed that small systems are

both more expensive to operate and less resilient to the

changes that are affecting health and safety.

This year, while no funding was dedicated to water

infrastructure, the legislature was active in addressing

water policy. In anticipation of a federal infrastructure

bill, legislation was passed to set up an infrastructure

assistance fund for utilities. The Indiana Finance

Authority is directed to investigate the future needs of

the utilities and determine their ability to provide water

for growing populations.

Another bill directs the state to set up a transboundary

groundwater authority to avoid interstate conflict that

has become a problem among neighboring states.

Finally, legislation was passed to allow utilities to look

further ahead when developing new supplies and, if

needed, make it affordable to replace lead service lines

so homeowners can be confident the water they drink is

as pure as what comes from the water treatment plant.

Taking the next steps

All of these bills move the state in the right

direction, but eventually we need to manage Indiana’s

water resources. That task is complicated by the fact

that Indiana has more than 500 water utilities, but less

than 100 of them are under the jurisdiction of the

Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission.

As a riparian state, users can withdraw what they

need. On the other hand, it makes sense that the state

provides information about growth rates in use and

even how that use affects the various watersheds

existing in Indiana. This will allow the many water

users to adapt their behavior to the circumstances.

Protecting the economy means making sure that

utilities manage our water resources together. Protecting

agricultural production in the state means helping

farmers see how often they can pump and how closely

they can install new irrigation wells. We need experience

tracking use in watersheds to ensure Indiana can thrive.

The future of Indiana is bright. We have plenty of

water, but we need to become better stewards as we

seek to maximize the benefits of our regionally

abundant water supplies.

State Sen.

Ed Charbonneau

AUTHOR:

Ed

Charbonneau has served

in the Indiana Senate since

2007. He represents

portions of Jasper, LaPorte,

Porter, Pulaski and Starke

counties. Learn more at

www.indianasenate

republicans.com

Indiana Water Policy

Looking Toward the Future

Since the drought in 2012, Indiana has been working to clarify water policy in a way that

ensures clean, safe drinking water for all Hoosiers while protecting our manufacturing and

agricultural economy.

GUEST COLUMN

Recycling

Continued from page 57